PanaloKO PG Soft Slots — Every Title & Its Published RTP
In this section you get 4 pages dealing with pg soft slots.
Key facts and contents
- PanaloKO Fortune Ox
- PG Soft's Fortune Ox plays on an irregular 3-4-3 grid and has 10 paylines.
- PanaloKO Lucky Neko
- Gigablox oversized symbol blocks feature in Lucky Neko, a PG Soft slot played on a 6x5 grid.
- PanaloKO Mahjong Ways 2
- PG Soft's Mahjong Ways 2 plays on a 5x4 grid, and the evaluation gives 2,000 ways to win.
- PanaloKO Mahjong Ways
- The PG Soft slot Mahjong Ways pays on 1,024 ways to win across a 5x4 grid.
Unlike Pragmatic, PG Soft seems to put out every game in one fixed configuration, not three, and it publishes a return-to-player figure for each title here. Showing that figure to visitors is the thing it fails to do: on its game pages the field renders as a blank dash, while the number lives in the data those pages are built from. There are 4 pages below.
Everything in this section
| Title | Published RTP | Max win | Ways to win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahjong Ways 2 | 96.95% | 100000x | the original’s 1,024 ways to win have grown to 2,000 |
| Fortune Ox | 96.75% | 2000x | 10 |
| Mahjong Ways | 96.92% | 25000x | 1,024 ways to win |
| Lucky Neko | 96.73% | 100000x | 40 base paylines that grow to 85 in free spins, giving up to 32,400 ways to win |
4 pages, with every page given over to one entry instead of summarising several. You can read on the entry’s own page who would have had to publish a field above that shows “not published”.
Each entry in a paragraph
Just enough about each to tell you which page deserves a click.
Mahjong Ways 2 explained
A 5-reel ways-to-win slot on 5 reels and 4 rows, the original’s 1,024 ways to win have grown to 2,000, released 2020. Built around a game tagged medium volatility that publishes a maximum of 100,000x, an unusual match.
Medium volatility is the description, alongside a published RTP of 96.95% and a maximum win of 100000x.
The Fortune Ox entry
Released in 2021, this slot runs 10 paylines over 3 reels with 3-4-3 rows. Built around a grid of irregular 3-4-3 shape, with the middle reel one row taller than each of the outer two.
With a published RTP of 96.75% and a maximum win of 2000x, it is described as medium volatility.
Mahjong Ways in full
Released in 2019, a 5-reel ways-to-win slot on 5 reels and 4 rows with 1,024 ways to win. Built around a climbing free-spins multiplier, raised by each cascade and never reduced across the round.
For this title the published figures are an RTP of 96.92%, a maximum win of 25000x and a medium volatility description.
Lucky Neko, in detail
A 6-reel ways-to-win slot on 6 reels and 5 rows, 40 base paylines that grow to 85 in free spins, giving up to 32,400 ways to win, released 2021. Built around single symbols that fill the whole grid, as oversized blocks of up to 6x6.
The record shows a 96.73% RTP and a 100000x maximum win, with the volatility described as medium.
The thing most often got wrong here
Wording every figure on these pages as “per PG Soft’s published game data” is correct; “as shown on PG Soft’s page” is not. Open the official page to double-check and the RTP slot there holds only a dash.
Nothing here is invented: each figure lined up with independent consensus on the same title, which strongly points to current data rather than stale numbers. Still, telling readers the number is visible on PG Soft’s page hands them a claim they can disprove with one click, which does more harm than leaving the number out.
Pg soft slots details are best verified from inside the game itself
Because the visible page does not carry the figure, a PG Soft check needs one extra step compared with a Pragmatic one:
- Go to the title’s page at pgsoft.com. A dash in the RTP field is normal here, and that is the reason these pages call it “published game data” instead of “shown on the page”.
- Weigh the figure listed here against two independent aggregators. Where the two sources matched, this site counted the underlying data as real and current.
- Test whether the grid shape agrees with the stated way-count. A flat “reels by rows” description gets the paytable wrong for several of these titles, which are irregular: Fortune Ox runs 3-4-3 and Wild Bounty Showdown runs 3-4-5-5-4-3.
- Maximum win for Treasures of Aztec: take it as still undecided. While PG Soft’s own data lists 100,000x as the maximum exposure, independent simulation puts a practical maximum close to 9,071x, and the two may be measuring different things.
Playing pg soft slots at PanaloKO
- Sign in at PanaloKO and open the slot lobby.
- Use name search to find a title from the table above, or narrow the lobby down by studio.
- Put the stake range and paytable from the game’s info screen next to the figures on this page and compare.
- Begin with a session budget in place, and keep your stake low while the feature round is still new to you.
FAQ
Does the PG Soft website list an RTP anywhere?
Its server sends the figure along with each game page's data, yet what appears in the visible field is just a blank dash. Its origin is the studio, though the page never displays it.
Is Pragmatic's habit of releasing several RTP configurations shared by PG Soft titles?
For the titles in this set, no sign of that turned up. A single fixed figure seems to accompany each one, so when a PG Soft RTP is quoted it carries more direct meaning than a Pragmatic quote.
Are these titles available at PanaloKO?
Search the PanaloKO lobby's Slots tab for the title you want. Every page in this section describes the game as its studio publishes it, so the figures stay true wherever you play it.
How do Mahjong Ways and Mahjong Ways 2 differ from each other?
Ways climb from 1,024 to 2,000 almost twofold, the cascade turns into an avalanche, and the published maximum goes from 25,000x up to 100,000x. Going from 96.92% to 96.95%, the RTP hardly shifts, so the higher ceiling is paid for by how infrequently it gets hit.
What explains the empty maximum win field for Treasures of Aztec?
Since the data field from PG Soft itself reads 100,000x, while independent simulation of the game's mathematics puts a practical maximum around 9,071x. The two may be measuring separate things, a certified ceiling on one side and a modelled outcome on the other, and choosing either one would misstate the other.
How should a 100,000x maximum win be read when the game is medium volatility?
It usually means the maximum is an accounting ceiling and not a realistic result. Results that cluster together are what a medium volatility label tells you about; a 100,000x ceiling is an event sitting well outside that cluster. The two can both hold, and of the pair the label tells you more.